Saturday, June 07, 2008

Parent and Child Interview

Working with children often requires gathering as much information from the parent and child relationship as possible. Often the nature of the relationship between Mother and child 'contains' the information required for the child's treatment plan in counselling. How can a counsellor gather Parent and Child information while effecting therapeutic gain at the same time?





Usually when I see a new client under 17 years of age I will invite both child and parent to the first counselling session. While taking the contact details and asking routine client information details, the child and parent being to settle comfortably in the room. I often find that the parent is needing to launch into the problematic scenarios of their child and sometimes they might be holding a report from school. Taking the initial interview slowly is helpful and is a containing method in counselling. I will always ask the parent whether the child is receiving treatments for anything. I ask the child his or her age inviting them to engaging with me. Often the reply to treatments is in relation to ADHD medications or asthma etc. This is a good opportunity to ask the child whether they think the medications work for them. Some children say yes and others say no. I stroke the child's ability to respond by saying "I like the way you know that".



The next thing to do is inquire about the contract for counselling. I invite the parent to describe the things she hopes her son might achieve in counselling if he is ok about doing some work with me. Leaving that option for the child's is helping to peel off Driver functions and pressures of adapting by the child. It is also building my relationship with the child. I observe any adverse reactions in the child and the extent of any prevailing sensitivity for them.


It is also important (in some cases) to "hear" the Parent Contract from the parent directly. What I mean by this is to observe how the parent expresses their "hopes" for the child. Often the Mother will begin to describe negative behaviours, however I will stop her and invite her to think about the positive things she hopes her child will gain from counselling. This is not an easy question for some parents. The most common and easy option for a parent is to say "I want my son to be happy" or "I want him to control his anger". I will spend some time helping the parent to re frame her "hopes" and investigate the benefits for the child if he does achieve such things from counselling. The positive outcomes for the child might mean having more friends, better relations at home etc. The child is listening intently to the parent voice and aligning mothers hopes with the possibilities in their life. The child at this stage seems to have more time to acclimatize to the counselling process as I work with the parent.




I will engage with the child next by asking about siblings and their ages while I am drawing the genogram of the family unit. In many cases parents have split up, so by asking empathicly, "when did you see Dad last" is imperative. Checking how often the child engages with a separated parent is also very important information. If there are any signs of affective responses in the child's body language I note that.



Observing the body language between child and parent in the early stages of the interview is the best means of information gathering.




It may be that the child is sitting in the chair in some manner, or the child diverts their attention to some play toys near by. Perhaps the child is siting quietly or being more vocal by answering the questions directed at the mother? All of these initial observations are very important signs to attachment styles and adaptations with the parent.

Perhaps I will ask the child in a straight way "do you think you have an anger issue" (like what mum is saying). I will always stroke their answer if they offer one.


The next part of the interview is to gain the permission from the child for me to ask the parent about behaviours. I describe that feelings are like snow flakes, everyone has unique ways to express feelings. "If I know about your special kind of feelings then I will know more about you". I invite the child to have a say if he or she disagrees with what the parent says. Usually the child says "yes ok". But it is not enough to leave this invitation just there, its best to formalise the contract with the child's ok-ness to disagree by asking "How will you let me know that you disagree with her"? It is a simple question however most children stumble around before saying "I will just say something". "Ok, good idea", I say. I need the child to be "in the room" and in this way to invite them into thinking about what is being said.


If the issue of anger has been raised initially I ask the parent to describe their observations of what the child "does" when he or she gets angry. I develop safety with the child by containing the parent from describing all manner of problems the child may have. "I am writing a small list" I say. The list will usually show the kind of anger that the child exhibits. The child may be throwing objects but not breaking anything, the child may be throwing things that are smashing. The anger might be verbal, or with clenched teeth or fists.The child might be using a threatening style of behaviour which may indicate concerns around control.

The child may back away or stand his ground. The child may run out the front or back door when angry. These are the important pieces of information to understand the child's process of repression, displacement, withdrawal, destructive anger. In many cases this information may help locate developmental stages the child is recycling in their attempts to handle their life. Perhaps there is more self esteem work required in contrast to anger work. Along the way I support the child's concerns by offering nurturing responses such as "that doesn't sound fair" or "that is a pretty common behaviour that I hear".


The best outcome for ongoing counselling with children requires the enlisting of both parent and child into committing to the process. Developing safety and building relationship with the child is paramount of all. The initial counselling interview with parent and child is not only about information gathering however developing all manner of contracts and establishing the counsellor-client relationship. I have so far described about one half of the initial assessment interview. I guess we are about half way through the hour session at this point.


My next installment will describe how to gain information about the child's own ability to deal with angry feelings, their ability to desensitise. I will describe how the child can identify patterns in their thinking feeling and behaviours. I will describe how I Invite the child into a contract for change and then participate in a simple activity to prove themselves that anger can be expressed without getting into trouble. I will also describe how feelings arise for the parent during the interview and the benefit for the Parent and Child relationship.



Kenoath

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Can't Come Won't Come

I am starting to wonder how many ways a client find to not come to counselling. It seems that the surf must be good today and the waves might be a better option to counselling sessions.




Is it the weather or is there something going on in the stars? I was even cancelled by my dentist this week which resulted in my own supervision session being cancelled. I have dealt with many intermittent cancellations over the last ten years however when there are several cancellations all in a matter of hours, I begin to wonder about the "collective". Teenagers can easily not be around for their parents to bring them in for counselling rather than taking responsibility in saying they don't want to come today. For some clients I have an idea that some part of the "not coming" to a session relates to recent situations in their lives they wish to avoid. "Won't Come"! I wonder what they are hiding from?



Perhaps it is the Moon or the stars, like Seasonal Affective Disorder. On my other blog (Kingsley) I talk about the current state of Astrological effects and it seems to be spot on for this week happenings. I feel ok about clients taking a different approach because it means that something is changing for them. Not many clients like getting a cancellation fees however their decision in not coming must say something for them.

I know I don't like going to the dentist because my teeth are pretty average. I know the dentist won't be critical of me but somewhere in the back of my mind there is some resistance to put myself in the chair. Perhaps I will feel bad? I will have to confront myself with the reality of my fillings etc. I know that I am not bad, even one or two of my teeth are bad. Well, this week I made an appointment only to be cancelled. Phew! Hang on, I need to get something fixed and it has taken me some effort to be assertive to make the appointment.

I can understand that clients need to cancel occasionally. There is a perceived degree of pain perhaps that some clients can't or wont face. In my mind that is the best time to go to counselling because there are some issues close to the surface. I know the spate of cancellations recently have nothing to do with my abilities and my cancellation fees will hopefully be paid.

Sometimes its just a matter of making a decision not to go. In my mind that is not a bad thing. At least the client is in some way making a decision from their child part

kenoath



Friday, April 25, 2008

Crossroad Wriggle

video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOorFNNbYFs

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Mind Snap

There seems to always be controversy in the ranks of Australian Rules Football these days. As the football nation gets over the all encompassing Ben Cousins drug affair, new players are emerging into the bad behavioural spotlight. Recently we have seen how some football stars have caught for pissing on police station walls. At the moment the spotlight is on big bad Barry Hall.



Apparently Barry Hall is seeing a Psychiatrist for what he has called his "Mind-snap" in his unprovoked king punch to footballer Brent Staker jaw. Well the Sydney Swans and Barry Hall may be in damage control using whatever PR to shift focus away from the incident which has in my view has brought the game of AFL into disrepute.


I have heard of situations where people suddenly "snap"; often kids and teenagers become overwhelmed with feelings and "do something" all of a sudden without thinking. I have two aspergers clients who deal with this type of behaviour weekly. Perhaps Barry Hall fits the aspergers profile and the psychiatrist will diagnose him with adult ADHD and the Australian football world will accept that his actions were a part of his mental illness? But what about other footballers who may have to play on Barry Hall after he serves a seven week suspension for nearly killing Brent Staker with one punch? Will they be prepped in "psycho" techniques to avoid the wrath of Barry Halls aggressive snap?


It is interesting that Ben Cousins received a 12 month ban from the sport for bringing the game into disrepute by his drug use and Barry Hall received only seven weeks for his "mind-snap". Then again, Australian football fans tend to enjoy a bit of rough play on the field. Even football commentators in the recent past have joked about and highlighted the physically aggressive incidents on the field like it was entertainment.

So it seems that we the Australian population, according to social sentiment, prefer knocking other blokes out with king punches rather than blokes "punching themselves" with drug usage.

So the scoring of this sentiment stands so far as:

One Punch Mind snaps (aggravated assault causing grievous bodily harm) brings a 7 Week suspension.

Using drugs and having a co dependant substance abuse brings 12 month suspension and de listing from the AFL.

We Australians are a very funny and interesting lot.

Kenoath